A Small Ban Of Terrorist? WTH Hillary?

Wow, what a Democratic debate we had Sunday as the eight Democratic presidential candidates faced off in New Hampshire. There seemed to be new strategy in the air. John Edwards forcefully challenged front-runners Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama over whether they had demonstrated leadership on key issues.

Of course Hillary insisted Democrats should focus their policy critiques on Republicans, especially President Bush. She understands there are differences among her running candidates, but dissed them off with this comment, one John Edwards brought to the podium again. She states:

"The differences among us are minor.The differences between us and Republicans are major and we don't want anybody in America to be confused."

Obama who seemed terribly nervous in the first debate was more gathered this round, who gave a smoother delivery this time and a more detailed grasp of policy issues.It must have been the triggered eye rolls or looks Mistress Hillary can give, not to mention the fits... Come to think of it, it very well may be a conspiracy, that when all have their say and the democratic people vote, it will be the three stooges, Clinton, Obama, and then, yes... wagging his tail behind and following proudly the "OTHER" Clinton.

So, this left Edwards to catch up with the polls and try to bring forth a new strategy that would place him up to their level. What more efficient means to do this, than to bring forth to the table the truth about issues and differences between them. So he threw out there the sharpest elbows, accusing them of being passive and cautious on urgent issues, like Iraq , health care and gay rights. I think before this is all over with, we will see exactly more of their hidden agenda, as all they have at this moment is to bash President Bush and to vote against our Military and the funding of them in Iraq. I mean what other excruciating damage could they possibly vote against than to refuse OUR Military funding? I'm ABSOLUTELY sure the United Nations , the whole world, must be very proud of our Senator's in Washington who would vote against their own Military. Hey... what a way to give morale, right?

There was differences between Obama and Edwards as well:

His rivals, Edwards said,"did not say anything about how they were going to vote, they were among the last people to vote," Edwards said.

"I think all of us have a responsibility to lead on these issues."

"There are differences between us, and I think Democratic voters deserve to know the differences between us," he said

"You're about four and a half years late on leadership on this issue,"Obama said.

Now is that calling the kettle black or what? But my all concern hit like a bullet when Clinton used this statement to define how she really understands terrorism. This is scary folks that this woman who is one of OUR senators within the United States approach toward 911 is labeled. Not only did she compare Edwards over his contention, that the war on terror is little more than a "bumper sticker" slogan she stated :

"I am a senator from New York. I have lived with the aftermath of 9/11, and I have seen firsthand the terrible damage that can be inflicted on our country by a small band of terrorists," she said.

A small band of terrorists? WTH is she talking about? A small band? That must be why Osama Bin Laden can't be found, right? That must be why the Bin Laden and his gang "hidden"who clearly sent us a message when Hussein was executed for all of his animalistic torturous crimes, not verbatim, but still the same message, that the USA will pay, who yet still remain in many countries around the globe. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out.

However, after saying the above, these words are verbatim, taken from a video tape on January 20, 2006 in which Bin Laden clearly states:

The war against America and its allies will not be confined to Iraq, the voice on the tape said,adding that Iraq has become a magnet for attracting and training talented fighters. It's only a matter of time, the voice said, referring to attacks. They are in the planning stages, and you will see them in the heart of your land as soon as the planning is complete.

Perhaps all should go back through my blogs and see what these small ban of terrorist have done to our nation and others. I've repeatedly said and will continue to say that WE AS A NATION, can't afford to let a woman run this country, especially one with a hidden agenda, and one who visions the attacks on 911 as just a small ban of terrorist! WTFU people!